Owner : Communication Centre
Director/Editor : Rajesh agrawal
Contact : +91 7424902863
Email : thechhattisgarh@gmail.com
Reg. Address : Communication Centre, Opp. Sani
Mandir, Ram sagar para, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

July 25, 2021

The Chhattisgarh

Beyond The Region

Supreme Court declines to hear plea for extra UPSC bid

Supreme Court docket declines to listen to plea for further UPSC bid | Information

New Delhi: The Supreme Court docket on Thursday declined to problem instructions to the Centre and the UPSC to grant an additional try and aspirants, who exhausted their final try on the prestigious civil companies examination in October final 12 months.
A bench of Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and Sanjiv Khanna mentioned it was sure by its three-judge bench judgment handed in Rachna vs Union of India final 12 months.
“The petitioners have made an unsuccessful try of persuading us to take a view that the difficulty raised within the current writ petitions shouldn’t be lined by the choice of three decide Bench of this Court docket dated February 24, 2021 in Rachna & Ors vs Union of India & Anr…,” the bench mentioned in its order.
Based on the writ petitioners, they kind a separate class – as they have been pressured to not seem within the examination on the given dates on account of instructions issued by the native authorities beneath the Catastrophe Administration Act, 2005, together with the overall instructions relating to isolation of Covid sufferers and members of the family of Covid sufferers. The petitioners contended that the state of affairs was considered one of pressured default, for which they can’t be in contrast with candidates who didn’t seem within the examination by alternative.
The bench mentioned: “Though, we might have full sympathy with writ petitioners and equally positioned college students, for the troublesome state of affairs and the resultant penalties they could endure, however the points raised by them, in our opinion, are lined by the choice of this Court docket in Rachna & Ors. (supra).”
It famous that the one indulgence that may be proven to the petitioners, together with the candidates, is to permit them to make illustration to the suitable authority, who might take into account all facets of the matter and take a lenient view within the gentle of the prevailing state of affairs on the related time.
“We aren’t expressing any opinion both means with regard to the feasibility of decision of the problems so raised. All facets in that regard are left open,” mentioned the bench, disposing of the petitions.
It clarified that any orders or instructions on this case would imply extra litigation and “chaos”, and noticed the courtroom can solely strike down a coverage if there’s manifest unreasonableness.
“As a substitute of interesting to us, why not attraction to the authority that made the coverage?”
Counsel, showing for a number of the petitioners, argued the judgment within the Rachna case handled solely these candidates who had given the examination in 2020, and didn’t cowl those that couldn’t seem within the examination on account of Covid-related difficulties and have become age-barred for the 2021 examination.
Dwell TV

%d bloggers like this: