AR Rahman, the Mozart of Madras, has landed in hot water after calling Hindi cinema ‘communal.’ The remark has provoked an fierce response from Hindu saints, who have gone as far as calling him a ‘jihadist,’ escalating tensions in cultural circles.
In a candid chat with media, Rahman expressed dismay at Bollywood’s narrative choices, accusing it of fostering division through religious tropes. ‘Hindi cinema’s communal turn is alarming,’ he said, advocating for stories that bridge communities.
The sant samaj hit back hard. From temples in Mathura to ashrams in Rishikesh, leaders organized dharnas, labeling Rahman’s views as divisive. ‘Jihadist agenda to tarnish Hindu pride in films,’ stated a key figure, calling for his ostracization from the industry.
With a discography boasting two Oscars and countless Filmfare awards, Rahman’s critique carries weight. Detractors argue it’s rich coming from someone who’s scored such films, while fans hail it as artistic integrity.
The row has spilled into politics, with spokespersons from various parties weighing in. OTT platforms and radio stations report mixed listener reactions, some pulling Rahman tracks preemptively.
Ultimately, this controversy spotlights Bollywood’s role in nation-building. Can the industry evolve beyond controversy, or will such clashes define its future? Rahman’s legacy hangs in balance amid the uproar.