Tensions between federal investigators and West Bengal’s leadership took center stage at the Supreme Court, where a petition accusing CM Mamata Banerjee of raid interference was postponed to March 18. The ED claims Banerjee and senior officials scuttled searches at I-PAC, a key Trinamool election consultancy.
Representing the agency, Solicitor General committed to submitting responses immediately. The plea urges criminal action against Banerjee, DGP Rajeev Kumar, and Commissioner Manoj Kumar for their alleged roles in the January incident.
Countering fiercely, Banerjee’s sworn statement accuses ED of unlawfully confiscating TMC’s strategic election intel during the Kolkata raids. She detailed her on-site intervention as a protective measure for proprietary data, emphasizing no disruption to legitimate enforcement.
The adjournment allows time for full briefs, promising a comprehensive hearing. This dispute encapsulates the friction between national agencies and regional powers, fueling debates on federalism and fair probes.
With eyes riveted on the apex court, the verdict could recalibrate power dynamics in India’s complex political landscape. Expect intense lobbying and analysis as March approaches, marking a crucial chapter in governance versus investigation rights.