Tensions peak in India’s top court as it gears up for Thursday’s hearing on the NCERT Class 8 Social Science book’s provocative ‘Corruption in the Judiciary’ reference. The judiciary’s self-initiated probe underscores its resolve to protect institutional sanctity.
CJI Suryakant, with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi, takes up the case flagged by senior advocates Kapil Sibal, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, and Mukul Rohatgi. ‘I uphold my responsibilities diligently,’ CJI asserted angrily. ‘Defamation of the judiciary is unacceptable under any circumstance. Suo motu action initiated.’
The textbook, unveiled on February 24, contained the disputed section, prompting swift condemnation. NCERT tendered an unqualified apology, embargoed supplies, and announced a comprehensive rewrite.
Prompt directives from the School Education and Literacy Department halted dissemination. NCERT’s statement emphasized the blunder’s accidental nature: ‘No design to diminish any body’s prestige.’ Post-consultation amendments ensure delivery in 2026-27.
‘Regrets expressed; vigilance promised henceforth,’ it concluded. This controversy illuminates challenges in balancing candid education with respect for state organs. The Supreme Court’s forthcoming observations could redefine protocols for NCERT publications, ensuring they inform without inflaming. Stakeholders await a balanced verdict that upholds truth while honoring democratic pillars.