A political firestorm erupted after Rahul Gandhi invoked the Epstein files in a pointed critique of PM Modi, only to face swift condemnation from BJP MP Kangana Ranaut. The Himachal lawmaker decried Gandhi’s phrasing as symptomatic of deep-seated corruption.
Ranaut minced no words: ‘Such vulgar word choice—talking of ‘maal’ and ‘kebab’ in Epstein files—from someone so morally bankrupt. Expectations should be zilch.’ Her response has gone viral, polarizing opinions.
In Parliament, Gandhi highlighted unreleased Epstein intel, claiming national interest in its contents. This follows the U.S. unveiling vast archives from the investigation into financier Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes against minors, released post his 2019 death.
Officially a suicide, Epstein’s case lingers with unanswered questions. India’s MEA countered a document citing Modi’s Israel itinerary as ‘delusional chatter from a felon,’ unworthy of attention.
The back-and-forth reveals fault lines in opposition-government relations, with Ranaut emerging as a combative voice. Her transition from silver screen to political arena continues to stir debates on decorum and rhetoric.
Gandhi’s allies frame his remarks as exposing hidden truths, countering accusations of impropriety. Yet, the controversy spotlights sensitivities around language in public life.
As reactions pour in, this incident may linger, influencing public perception and media coverage. It exemplifies how distant scandals become ammunition in India’s vibrant democracy.