A disturbing escalation in West Bengal’s political violence saw Suvendu Adhikari’s convoy come under vicious attack, drawing unqualified condemnation from BJP state president Sukanta Majumdar. In his strongest terms yet, Majumdar pronounced democracy ‘thoroughly terminated’ in the state.
Detailing the sequence of events, Majumdar recounted how ‘a rampaging mob, clearly identifiable as TMC workers,’ hurled stones and bricks at the moving convoy. ‘This wasn’t spontaneous violence; it was a well-planned assassination attempt on democracy itself,’ he asserted during an emergency press briefing.
Majumdar connected the dots to paint a comprehensive picture of systematic persecution. ‘Ever since Suvendu Adhikari exposed TMC’s corruption in Nandigram, he’s been target number one. This convoy attack is just the latest chapter in their vendetta,’ he explained. He highlighted the state administration’s alleged complicity, noting the suspiciously delayed police response.
Calling for national attention, Majumdar urged Union Home Minister Amit Shah to intervene decisively. ‘Bengal’s opposition leaders need Z-plus security. The Election Commission must annul any polls conducted under such terror,’ he demanded. The BJP plans a statewide agitation to highlight the lawlessness.
Adhikari, maintaining characteristic defiance, addressed workers via video conference. ‘They can damage vehicles but not our democratic spirit,’ he said. His resilience has become symbolic of BJP’s fightback against perceived TMC hegemony.
Political observers note this incident fits into a larger narrative of declining political civility in West Bengal. With assembly by-elections approaching, both parties face intense pressure to control their cadres. However, Majumdar’s dramatic declaration has shifted focus to fundamental questions about governance and democratic space.
The convoy attack thus transcends a mere security breach, emerging as a defining moment that could reshape Bengal’s political trajectory. As investigation agencies swing into action, all eyes remain on whether justice will prevail over political expediency.