A powerful voice in women’s rights, Vrinda Adige, has accused Hubli police of savage misconduct, asserting that women’s safety is an inviolable constitutional entitlement. Her condemnation has mobilized public sentiment, casting a harsh light on lapses in law enforcement protocols.
The core of the uproar: a distressed woman enters a police outpost for succor, emerges battered. Adige chronicled the barbarity—rough handling, abusive language, and coercion—framing it as systemic rot. ‘Our Constitution doesn’t tolerate such savagery,’ she told a packed media conference.
Backed by visuals from bystanders’ phones, the story has snowballed into a statewide scandal. Adige wove in legal threads, citing Supreme Court directives on custodial dignity and police conduct. She rallied for a special investigation team free from local influences.
Community leaders and bar associations have joined the fray, filing complaints and petitions. The police hierarchy, under siege, announced departmental action, but Adige insists on judicial oversight to prevent cover-ups.
Zooming out, this incident mirrors national concerns over women’s encounters with the system—often marked by skepticism and hostility. Adige advocated tech solutions like panic buttons in stations and AI-monitored interactions.
Her message culminates in hope tempered by resolve: true security demands empowered policing. With protests brewing and probes underway, Hubli stands at a crossroads—choose reform, or court infamy.