Chaos gripped Parliament as President Droupadi Murmu addressed both houses, prompting fierce backlash from Union Minister Kiren Rijiju against opposition disruptors. In forthright media comments, he branded their actions a profound national disgrace, predicting lasting public wrath.
Key highlights of the speech—Vande Mataram’s 150th year, homage to Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay, and remembrance of Guru Teg Bahadur’s ultimate sacrifice—were rudely interrupted by slogan-shouting and unrest. Rijiju decried the insensitivity: ‘These are unifying moments for India, not platforms for petty protests.’
Distinguishing democratic debate from outright anarchy, he challenged: ‘Can any conscientious MP justify this?’ The minister framed the address as a collective national narrative, binding all Indians beyond political divides.
Rijiju’s appeal for introspection targets opposition ranks, reminding them of Parliament’s hallowed status. As tensions simmer, this clash highlights the fragility of legislative harmony in polarized times.
Ultimately, the episode compels reflection on leadership standards. Voters, attuned to such lapses, will judge accordingly. True statesmanship lies in restraint and respect, especially during symbols of shared heritage.