A seismic shift in the Sikh Guru controversy unfolded as the Delhi Assembly rejected Punjab Police’s FSL report outright, issuing a stern notice for accountability. This move amplifies calls for unbiased forensic re-examination.
The dispute centers on relics purportedly tied to Sikh founders, where Punjab’s forensics aimed to authenticate claims. Critics in Delhi argue the report’s flaws undermine its authority, pointing to inadequate documentation and biased sampling.
Assembly debates were fiery, with leaders decrying ‘selective science.’ The notice outlines rigorous demands: full audit trails, witness statements, and comparative analyses. Punjab has 15 days to respond, or face escalation.
Sikh diaspora voices echo support from afar, urging national-level probes. Punjab counters with assertions of report integrity, hinting at political vendetta from Delhi.
This episode underscores challenges in forensic diplomacy between states. As stakeholders brace for replies, the case’s resolution could redefine historical narratives and bolster faith in institutional forensics.
Delhi’s decisive step promises momentum toward clarity in the Sikh Guru matter, potentially healing old wounds or sparking new battles.