A groundbreaking Supreme Court judgment has ruled out any judicial mandate to force women into continuing pregnancies they reject, spotlighting a minor’s 30-week termination plea. The bench’s stance: her wish is paramount.
Recounting the facts, the girl was 17 during conception via a relationship, casting shadows of doubt on consent. The court, however, pivoted to her present resolve against motherhood, deeming it decisive.
Acknowledging the moral quandary of fetal viability versus maternal rights, the justices concluded that bodily autonomy cannot be infringed. ‘Compulsion absent will is unjust,’ they asserted.
Mumbai’s JJ Hospital received directives for a meticulously safe abortion procedure, with safeguards for the petitioner’s holistic health.
Praised by experts, this decision bolsters reproductive freedoms, especially for at-risk youth. It heralds an era where courts defer to women’s choices in procreative matters.
In broader implications, the ruling could reshape abortion policies, advocating for victim-centered approaches that honor dignity and agency over rigid timelines or presumptions.