Fresh off Yoweri Museveni’s seventh presidential win in Uganda, attention turns to a fundamental governance question: how many terms can one leader serve? From rigid presidential systems to fluid parliamentary ones, term limits—or their absence—define political landscapes. We examine standout examples, highlighting reforms that have reshaped leadership possibilities.
The United States mandates a maximum of two four-year presidential terms under the 22nd Amendment. France caps at two consecutive five-year terms following 2008 updates that curtailed prior flexibility for intermittent service.
In Russia, 2008 extended terms to eight years; 2020’s ‘reset’ clause erases past counts, positioning Putin for office until 2036. China removed all presidential term barriers in 2018, aligning with party dominance.
Iran offers two four-year stints, potentially more in special cases; Brazil sticks to two consecutive terms. India’s PMs enjoy unlimited terms with Lok Sabha confidence, synced to five-year polls.
Britain’s PM position has no cap, hinging on Commons majority within five-year windows. Canada follows suit, with frequent four-year elections. Pakistan’s symbolic presidency and uncapped premiership reflect this trend, as do Germany’s chancellorship (Merkel’s 16 years) and Israel’s revised no-limit PM rules.
These disparities—from America’s checks to China’s openness—reveal philosophies on power. Uganda’s scenario amplifies concerns over indefinite rule, even as proponents argue for seasoned leadership. In an era of populist surges, term limits remain a battleground for safeguarding democracy.