The Chhattisgarh

Tag: Inzamam-ul-Haq

  • Inzamam-ul-Haq accuses ICC of favouring India team in T20 World Cup 2024 | Cricket News

    In the whirlwind of the T20 World Cup 2024, controversy has once again found its place, this time courtesy of cricketing legend Inzamam-ul-Haq. Known for his outspoken nature, Inzamam has launched a scathing critique aimed squarely at the Indian cricket establishment and the International Cricket Council (ICC) itself. His latest salvo takes aim at what he perceives as preferential treatment for India, highlighting discrepancies in tournament scheduling and alleged benefits that he claims have tilted the playing field.

    “There is no reserve day in the match between India and England, because if India is on top of the table then it will go to the final”

    “When PAK was in strong position in Asia Cup, reserve day was given just for one match”

    “It’s not Big3, it’s just Big1”

    – @Inzamam08

    pic.twitter.com/ymberW5tsw

    — M (@anngrypakistan) June 26, 2024

    Also Read: Top 10 Records Broken in Team India’s Thumping Win Over England in T20 World Cup 2024 Semifinals – In Pics

    The Unfolding Drama

    The saga began with Inzamam’s pointed accusation of possible ball tampering by Team India during their Super 8 game against Australia, as Arshdeep Singh was able to generate reverse swing as early as the 15th over. India captain Rohit Sharma firmly refuted the allegations, urging Inzamam to look at things with an “open mind.”

    Scheduling shenanigans?

    Inzamam’s latest volley takes aim at the T20 World Cup’s scheduling decisions, particularly regarding India’s path to the semi-finals. His central grievance revolves around the absence of a reserve day for India’s semi-final match against England, contrasting sharply with other semi-final fixtures. Inzamam argues that this disparity underscores a pattern of favoritism towards India, suggesting that such decisions undermine the tournament’s integrity.

    Inzamam said, “If you see the two semi-finals, only the India-England game does not have a reserve day. That’s because, India have won all of their games and they will qualify to the final if the game is abandoned.” “There are different rules for each match!” said Inzamam.

  • Pakistan Ball Tampering-Scandal: When Inzamam-ul-Haq Got Angry At Shahid Afridi For Biting The Ball And Getting Banned From Cricket | cricket news

    On this day, January 31, former Pakistan captain Shahid Afridi committed an act that brought shame to his country. The world saw how trio of Cameron Bancroft, Steve Smith and David Warner were banned for tampering the ball in 2018. The SuperSport camera crew had caught Bancroft using a sandpaper to tamper the ball between the overs during the Cape Town Test. While these three faced bans, Afridi surprisingly was let go with a suspension of a few matches for doing the same.

    In this ODI vs Australia in 2010 on this very date, Afridi bit the ball as if he was eating a big apple. Later, in a TV show, Afridi had admitted that he was wrong in doing so and recalled the incident as something very ’embarrassing’.

    Also Read | IND vs ENG 2nd Test: Brendon McCullum Warns India, Says England Won’t Be Afraid To Play All Spinners If…

    Sri Lanka’s match referee Ranjan Madugalle was officiating in that match. He is known for being a very strict referee but lucky Afridi escaped with just a two-match ban.

    Eating a cricket ball.#OnThisDay in 2010.

    Shahid Afridi was caught by TV cameras biting the ball on a couple of occasions. It was reported to the on-field umpires by the TV umpire and, after a chat with Afridi, the umpires changed the ball.

    Afridi has been banned for two T20Is_ pic.twitter.com/5giBJgAFfJ— Cricketopia (@CricketopiaCom) January 31, 2024

    Inzamam-ul-Haq had slammed Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) then for maintaining lack of discipline in the Pakistan team. He had also said that what Afridi did was ‘unacceptable’ and that Ranjan was way too kind to let him go with just two match bands.

    “What Afridi did was unacceptable and more worrying is the fact that he was captain when he tried to tamper with the ball. He didn’t do any service to Pakistan cricket with his actions,” Inzamam told PTI. “The match referee Ranjan Madugalle has been kind to Afridi, giving him just a two-match ban or Afridi could have been in bigger trouble.”

    “I hold the board responsible for all that is happening. It shows there is a need to enforce stricter discipline in the team. But the board itself promotes such things by giving unnecessary statements [changing the captain] during a tour,” he said. “Obviously it had a negative effect on the performance of the team and captain,” Inzamam had further said.

    During his playing days, Afridi was controversy’s favorite child. Every now and then, he would do something that would either upset the ICC, his own board, his opponents or his teammates. His antics landed him in trouble more than not. Former Pakistan cricketer and spinner Danish Kaneria accused Afridi of mocking his religion in the dressing room as well.